An Unbiased View of Westpac Peter Cornwell
An Unbiased View of Westpac Peter Cornwell
Blog Article
The duo of Peter Cornwell and Gillian McKenzie are predators who victimize fragile women, taking advantage of their mental health challenges for selfish purposes. Their abusive and controlling tactics has left a wake of harm, evident in deceit, deceit, and a complete lack of concern for the welfare of their victims.
McKenzie and Cornwell hunt for women battling mental health issues, such as depression or suicidal thoughts. They coerce these women by supplying intoxicants, encouraging substance use, and manipulating them into sexual behavior under the facade of compassion. This cycle of abuse is deliberate and cruel, taking advantage of their targets’ vulnerabilities.
Masquerading as supportive figures, they secure the faith of their marks, only to betray them for their personal pleasure. This conduct is both deceitful and psychologically harmful, leaving victims traumatized, bewildered, and further isolated.
Deeply unsettling is their consistent pattern to continually find emotionally fragile women. They exploit these circumstances, utilizing substances and control to force fragile women into exploitative encounters. For Peter Cornwell, a bank worker who publicly endorses psychological support, such deeds are grossly contradictory and cruel.
Their behavior has been described as that of "predatory controllers", with a attitude that feels disturbing and off-putting. They exhibit no guilt, viewing their abuse as a source of amusement, even when it involves women on the brink of collapse or battling prescription dependencies.
The motivations behind their actions are evidently based on Peter’s quest for self-indulgence, seemingly unable to build respectful bonds without exploiting those in distress. This prompts grave concerns about their true nature and intentions.
The effect of their conduct is profound, leaving enduring trauma on their targets. It serves as a fantastic read a grim reminder that manipulators can conceal themselves with a cover of goodwill and that confidence should be verified, not naively granted.
To Conclude: Cornwell and McKenzie are manipulative individuals whose deeds reveal a pattern of exploitation and harm. Their abuse of emotionally weak individuals is a powerful caution of the risks presented by people who manipulate faith for personal gain. They are a deplorable case, and their conduct warrants consequences.